Learning Programming is Hard
Many challenges face the new Computer Science learner. One of the most interesting times for students learning to program is that period after they’ve learned a new feature or programming strategy, but before they’ve had a chance to really master it. The syntax may still be unfamiliar, or the strategy is “the same, but different” as something that they’ve seen before.
A Parsons Puzzle
I first stumbled upon the “Parsons Problem” type of question in a paper by researchers Denny, Luxton-Reilly, and Simon, Evaluating a New Exam Question: Parsons Problems, published in 2008, which led me to Parsons and Haden’s original paper Parsons’ programming puzzles: a fun and effective learning tool for first programming courses.
A “Parson’s Puzzle” is a programming problem delivered via computer, in which code fragments, manipulated via a drag-and-drop interface, may be assembled to form a correct, working program. Clicking a “Check” button would provide some sort of feedback. Parsons and Haden proposed that the nature of the puzzle would improve engagement with the topic, provide better structure for students still struggling to understand fundamental logic, strategies, or algorithms, and even intentionally allow for common errors so that a student could get immediate feedback on fundamental misunderstandings.
Parsons and Haden’s original idea of helping to teach students with an automated system was adapted to a paper-based means of assessing students by Denny, Luxton-Reilly, and Simon. Along the same lines, it’s certainly possible to use a paper-based strategy of helping students develop and clarify their thinking on any given computer programming topic.
A Paper-Based Parsons Problem in the Classroom
In an introductory computer science course taught using Python, students had recently learned about functions, and had had the chance to learn how to use functions in several different contexts. Students were paired randomly and given a paper copy of the activity here [PDF], and asked to a) arrange the lines of code into strips of paper that they would assemble into a working version of the program, and then b) enter their code into the computer to verify that it works as intended.
"""
quad_functions.py
This program solves quadratic equations using three functions:
* one function to get the coefficients a, b, and c
* one function to calculate the two roots, and
* one function to print out the results
@author You
@version 1.0
"""
def get_coeffs():
def get_coeffs(a, b, c):
def calculate_roots(a,b,c):
def main():
def calculate_roots():
def display_solutions(root1, root2):
def display_solutions():
main()
a, b, c = get_coeffs()
root1 = (-b + (b * b - 4 * a * c) ** (1/2)) / (2 * a)
root2 = (-b - (b * b - 4 * a * c) ** (1/2)) / (2 * a)
x, y, z = get_coeffs(a, b, c)
display_solutions(r1, r2)
return root1, root2
display_solutions()
display_solutions(a, b, c)
print(root1, root2)
return a, b, c
print("The solutions are: ")
a = eval(input("Enter coefficient a: "))
b = eval(input("Enter coefficient b: "))
c = eval(input("Enter coefficient c: "))
r1, r2 = calculate_roots()
a, b, c = get_coeffs()
r1, r2 = calculate_roots(a, b, c)
if __name__ == "__main__":
#!/usr/bin/env python3
Observations
Students took the assignment seriously, and seemed to appreciate the nature of the puzzle, and the fact that all of the information was available to them—they just had to (literally) put the pieces together. There were some lively discussions—”Do we need a function header with parameters or not? Do we need the function to return a value or not?”—as well as a desire to get done with the puzzle-solving as quickly as possible in order to move onto entering the code into the computer to test their program.
For a larger assignment or project with many variations, the Parsons approach is not well-suited: there are too many variations that need to be considered. For students just learning to master a new topic, however—functions, conditionals, while-loops, for-loops, etc—the Parsons Problem strategy is a great way to build students’ skills and confidence in programming.
References
Paul Denny, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and Beth Simon. 2008. Evaluating a new exam question: Parsons problems. In Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113-124.
Dale Parsons and Patricia Haden. 2006. Parson’s programming puzzles: a fun and effective learning tool for first programming courses. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing Education – Volume 52 (ACE ’06), Denise Tolhurst and Samuel Mann (Eds.), Vol. 52. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 157-163.
I don’t know whether it’s just me or if perhaps
everyone else encountering issues with your blog. It appears as though some of the text within your posts
are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and
let me know if this is happening to them too? This might be
a issue with my browser because I’ve had this happen before.
Thank you